INDUSTRIAL ACTION: THE LAW IN KENYA


INTRODUCTION
Labor rights are rights arising from labor relations between workers and their employers, and accrue under labor and employment law. One of the key rights includes the right to unionize. Unions adopt collective bargaining and industrial action to improve working conditions for their members.
Employees regard trade unions as essential to their welfare since, without them, they are not in a position to bargain collectively with the employers. They resist any attempt by the employers to weaken their unions and fight to win the right of collective bargaining through the unions. To-day the policy of our Government is, on the one hand, to prevent industrial strife between the employers and the employees, and on the other, to secure economic justice for the employees.

Industrial action is a means through which employees use in order to acquire new or better conditions at the workplace. Industrial action is also a strike action which involves a dispute of interest aimed at creating new terms and conditions of their employment.
•           Strikes
•           Unionbans on overtime
•           Limitations on work – go slows & work-to rules
•           Secondary boycotts
•           Picketing
•           Sit-ins.

Demands pursued through industrial action by way of strikes may be categorized as Occupational which seek to guarantee or improve workers’ living and working conditions, or trade union demands which are aimed at developing the rights of trade unions and their leaders.The main issue is whether the distinction influences the outcome of the strike, and their impact on the welfare of workers, whether direct or indirect. In this respect, much debate is done over political and sympathy strikes, and whether they fall within the principles of freedom of association.
a)      Protected industrial action: complies with the rules and procedures set out in the Labor Relations Act (LRA). If the industrial action complies with the law, then employees may not be dismissed by their employer for taking such action.
b)      Unprotected industrial action: does not comply with the rules and procedures set out in the LRA. The courts are not sympathetic towards employees who go on an unprotected strike. If an employer dismisses employees who go on an unprotected strike, it is not likely that the court will help these employees.

The right to strike is a fundamental element of collective bargaining. Industrial action is one of the avenues used by employees to protect their economic and social interests and resolve industrial disputes.
Legislative framework is has a role in equalizing bargaining power and promoting stable bargaining. The International Labour Organisation attempts to ensure that the right of parties to take industrial action is balanced against other rights of workers, employers, and the public (for example, non-striking workers have freedom to work, as well as the right to protection of property and personal safety).[1]

Article 23 (4) provides that everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. This underpins the importance of trade unions in protecting workers’ or employer(s) interests, and one of the available mechanisms is industrial action.

Art 8 (1) provides that state parties are to ensure that the right of everyone to form and join trade unions of their choice is protected, and that this shall only be subject to the rules of the organisation concerned. The purpose of these unions is the promotion and protection of economic and social interests of workers. Further part (c) therein provides that trade unions are to function free of limitations other than those prescribed by law, which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public order or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Art 8 (1) (d) provides that state parties undertake to ensure the right to strike is exercised in conformity with their national laws.

Kenya ratified Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining. This Convention concerns the application of the principles of the right to organize and to bargain collectively. It recognizes the right to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket, and to present petitions to public authorities allows employees to take industrial action while championing for their rights.
Article 1 of the Convention provides that workers shall enjoy adequate protection against acts of anti-union discrimination in respect of their employment while Article 1 (2) outlines that such protection shall apply more particularly in respect of acts calculated to make the employment of a worker subject to the condition that he shall not join a union or relinquish trade union membership.
Furthermore, Article 1 (2) (b) outlines that the protection extends to causing dismissal of or otherwise prejudice a worker by reason of trade union membership or because of participation in union activities outside working hours or with the consent of the employer, within working hours.


This court was originally established under the Industrial Court Act and named the Industrial Court. It was however renamed to Employment and Labour Relations Court in accordance with Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2014.[2] This court was established for the purpose of settling employment and industrial relations disputes and the furtherance, securing and maintenance of good employment relations in Kenya.[3]

It has exclusive, original and appellate jurisdiction to hear and determine all disputes relating to employment and labour relations. These include those arising out of employment with regard to employer and employee, an employer and a trade union, between trade unions and employer organisation, between an employer’s organisation or a federation and a member. Further, the court is also concerned with disputes on registration and election of trade union officials and disputes relating to the registration and enforcement of collective agreements.[4]

Thus, it is against the public interest and provisions of the Trade Disputes Act to permit any employer to harass, mistreat or undermine the trade unions which form a part of the most effective instruments of the Government policy of industrial peace through representative negotiations between them and the employers; and any systematic attempt by an employer to use his powers of management to disrupt the trade union of his employees will be condemned by this Court.[5]

The Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services is a key player in the institutional framework governing strikes and general industrial action in Kenya. The ministry has the mandate of managing industrial and labour relations. It is in charge of registration and supervision of trade unions. This function is performed through the Office of the Registrar of Trade Unions.

The Office of the Registrar of Trade Unions registers and manages the activities of trade unions. Apart from registering trade unions, this institution also registers employers’ organisations and federations of trade unions. It has the mandate of ensuring that these registered bodies carry out activities. Under section 20 of the Labour Relations Act, the registrar may refuse the application for registration for the aforementioned bodies if he/she is not satisfied that the body meets the registration requirements.
The registrar further ensures that no person performs any act in furtherance of a trade union or employer’s organisation unless that trade union or employer’s organisation is registered, or an application for its registration is being considered.[6]
The International Labour Organisation was formed in 1919 as part of the League of Nations to protect worker’s rights. It was later incorporated into the United Nations. The UN protects workers’ rights through its various instruments, including the Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Notably, the ILO Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize Convention No. 87 of 1948, and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention No. 98 of 1949 do not explicitly make reference to a right to strike. Authors have noted that these Conventions, having no specific provisions on the right to strike, do not therefore set out a global, precise and detailed, absolute and unlimited right.
The Committee on the Freedom of Association and the Committee of Experts on the application of Conventions and Recommendations have frequently asserted that the right to strike is a fundamental right of workers, and the committee has defined the limits thereof.
Further, the International Labour Conference, which issues guidelines for ILO policies, passed the Resolution Concerning the Abolition of Anti-Trade Union Legislation in the States Members of the International Labour Organisation 1957, which called for adoption of laws to ensure the effective and unrestricted exercise of trade unions rights, including the right to strike, by the workers.
Article 2 (6) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 provides that ‘any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall form part of the law of Kenya under this Constitution’. By virtue of this article, any international human rights instrument that Kenya ratifies becomes part of the law of Kenya and it is enforceable before the domestic courts.
The right to industrial action is constitutionally recognized under Article 41 (2) (d) which outlines that every worker has the right to go on strike. This right is also recognized by the Convention. Thus workers in Kenya whose right to industrial action has been denied or infringed can rely on the Convention to claim redress.
This position was highlighted in the case of Tailors & Textiles Workers’ Union v. Bedi Investments Ltd where the court was of the view that, for the benefit of the employers and the employees in general, one of the functions of this Court is to protect legitimate trade union activities. Further, it was of the viewthat the State, in maintaining the balance between the employers and the employees, has a duty to preserve peace within the industry. On the one hand, it must discourage strikes by the employees, and on the other, put down any acts of victimization or unfair labor practices by the employers, which are a fruitful cause of industrial strife.

The Labor Relations Act was enacted to specifically address labor relations. The purpose of this Act is to promote sound labour relations through the protection and promotion of freedom of association, the encouragement of effective collective bargaining and promotion of orderly and expeditious dispute settlement, conducive to social justice and economic development.
The procedures that should be followed before an industrial action is legal is governed under Section 76 of the Act, which provides thus:
 ‘A person may participate in a strike or lock-out if—
a)      the trade dispute that forms the subject of the strike or lock-out concerns terms and conditions of employment or the recognition of a trade union;
b)      the trade dispute is unresolved after conciliation—
 (i) under this Act; or
(ii) as specified in a registered collective agreement that provides for the private conciliation of disputes; and
c)      seven days written notice of the strike or lock-out has been given to the other parties and to the Minister by the authorised representative of— (i) the trade union, in the case of a strike; (ii) the employer, group of employers of employers’ organisation, in the case of a lock-out.’


The following cases are instances where workers engaged in protected and unprotected rights:
In the case of Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union V Maji Mazuri Flowers Ltd,[7] the issue for determination was whether the Respondent was bound by the Return to Work Formula not to dismiss the grievant for engaging in an unprotected strike. From the facts presented before the Court, the grievant were among a group of about 50 employees who were suspected of having participated in an unprotected strike. The strike took place at the behest of the Claimant Union to whom the grievant were members.
The strike lasted for a very short time because the matter was resolved through conciliation presided over by the Ministry of Labour. This case highlights the room that has been afforded by the courts in determining cases based on their merits as opposed to arguing on the basis of whether they feel under the typologies of protected and unprotected.
In Kenya Ferry Services Limited v Dock Workers Union (Ferry Branch),[8]the Applicant sought an injunctive order prohibiting the Respondent from calling an unprotected strike, cessation of work or go slow of its members. The principles for grant of such injunctive orders were set out in the case of Giella  v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd.[9]The principles set out in the Giella case are largely applicable in the Industrial Court. However, owing to the nature of some of the disputes handled by the Court, other considerations may be applicable before an injunctive relief is granted. The Court is therefore entitled to add to, adopt or modify the principles. To help unravel and determine whether the Applicant has made out a case for the grant of the reliefs sought, the Court in this case examined the statutory provisions governing the operations of the Applicant and the calling of a (un)protected strike.
In Thakrar vs. Cir Cittero Menswear PLC (in administration)[10]The English High Court held that a mediated settlement was an enforceable contract.However, in many jurisdictions including ours, the principal methods of enforcing a settlement agreement reached at mediation or conciliation is as a contract. This is “unsatisfactory result since that enforcement mechanism leaves the party precisely where it started in most cases, with a contract which it is trying to enforce.”[11]
Cognizant of these difficulties of enforcing agreements reached in mediation or conciliation, it is desirable to specifically provide in the agreement itself that the parties have agreed to present the same before court to be reduced into an order of the court. This should be done without the necessity of having to commence judicial proceedings as in the present case. It was the court’s considered view that the Respondent was bound by the terms of the Return to Work Formula entered into on 5th August, 2011.
In ASLEF v London Midland, the court of appeal, held, for the first time, that the international recognition and context of the right to strike is relevant to the interpretation of the UK legislation, restating the position adopted in P v NASUWT (2003) that the law should be given a “likely and workable construction”.
In the case of RMT v Serco Docklands, the notices provided to the employers by a union, before an industrial action should be adequately detailed out. The Court found there was no statutory obligation requiring the union to use any particular category of jobs and therefore no obligation on the union to adopt the categories used for pay purposes. It accepted that the approach adopted by the union was perfectly sensible - which was to notify the employer of the jobs identified by the workers themselves and complied with the statutory obligation.






REFERENCES
Constitution of Kenya 2010.
Statutes
1.      Labour Relations Act.
2.      Industrial Court Act.
3.      Trade Disputes Act.
4.      Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2014.
International instruments
1.      Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948.
2.      Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize Convention No. 87 of 1948.
3.      Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining 1949.
4.      1957 Resolution Concerning the Abolition of Anti-Trade Union Legislation in the States Members of the International Labour Organisation.
5.      International Covenant for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966.

Articles
1.      Research Paper No. 33 2007-08 – Striking a balance: the need for further reform of the law relating to industrial action. Jane Romeyn 25th June 2008 Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP0708/08rp33#_Toc202155969.
2.      Gernigon, B; Odero, A & Guido, H: ILO Principles Concerning the Right to Strike – International Labour Review Vol. 137 (1998) No. 4.
3.      Edna Sussman: “The Final step issued in Enforcing Mediation Settlement Agreement”, Fordham Law School, New York, 2008.

Online sources
1. http://www.knut.or.ke/index.php/2012 (accessed 29 March 2015)
2. http://www.thinkafrica.com (accessed 28 March 2015)
3. William Robert Ochieng & Robert M. Maxom ‘An Economic History of Kenya’. Retrieved fromhttp://books.google.co.ke/books/about/An_economic_history_of_Kenya.html?id=wY62AAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed 28 March 2015).
Case law
1.      ASLEF v London Midland,IRLR 399 (CA)
2.      RMT v Serco Docklands[2011] EWCA Civ. 226
3.      P v NASUWT (2003)
4.      Kenya Ferry Services Limited v Dock Workers Union (Ferry Branch) [2014] eKLR
5.      Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union V Maji Mazuri Flowers Ltd [2012] eKLR
6.      Thakrar vs. Cir Cittero Menswear PLC (in administration) [2002] EWHC 1975 (Ch.)
7.      Tailors & Textiles Workers’ Union v. Bedi Investments Ltd, Cause No. 30 of 1991.


[1] Research Paper No. 33 2007-08 – Striking a balance: the need for further reform of the law relating to industrial action. Jane Romeyn 25th June 2008 Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP0708/08rp33#_Toc202155969
[2] Retrieved from http://www.judiciary.go.ke/portal/blog/post/industrial-court-renamed  (accessed on 26th March 2015)
[3] Section 4 Industrial Court Act
[4] Section 12 Industrial Court Act
[5] Thakrar vs. Cir Cittero Menswear PLC (in administration) [2002] EWHC 1975 (Ch.)
[6] Section 23 Labour Relations Act
[7] [2012]eKLR.

[8] [2014] eKLR.
[9] (1973) EA 338.
[10]{2002} EWHC 1975 (Ch).


courtesy of group 14, KUSOL class of 2015
[11]Edna Sussman: “The Final step issued in Enforcing Mediation Settlement Agreement”, Fordham Law School, New York, 2008.


7 comments:

  1. For many people this is the best solution here see how to do it. https://www.paulmankin.com/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Despite the massive efforts of the credit reporting agencies to convince you otherwise, there are many credit repair companies that are no different than most other services. Like all industries, less-than-honest companies do exist and are damaging to their clients and to the credit repair industry as a whole. For example, you may have 20 car mechanics in your hometown. What is a DC Motor

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, What a Excellent post. I really found this to much informatics. It is what i was searching for.I would like to suggest you that please keep sharing such type of info.Thanks Rectify

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Internet is a powerful tool to access information on any subject area, and one can find an incredible amount of car care information with a click of a button. Furthermore, with the help of a regular web search one can also find network links to information about automotive repair, vehicle maintenance, automotive diagnostic data and labor estimates. There are also a lot of good online auto repair web sites with individual articles that can answer your questions on all sorts of auto repair and car maintenance topics, such as how to change your oil, the best way to bleed brakes, why a car might stall or be hard to start, what color your radiator fluid should be, or even how to drive a stick shift. Chemical Hose

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anything on the need for reform on the development of the jurisprudence of unprotected industrial action

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey, you used to write wonderful, but the last few posts have been kinda boring… I miss your tremendous writings. Past few posts are just a little out of track! come on! مذكرة دفاع للرد على دعوى تعويض

    ReplyDelete