PART 2- PART 3 COMING SOON
Investments by Trustees Generally
At common law, trustees were viewed as stewards of
trust property. In those days the primary asset entrusted to trustees was land.
The threshold of care was that the trustee would take care of trust property as
if it was his own. The industrial revolution brought on new forms of property
e.g. factories and shares. There was a new requirement in equity that trustees
invest trust funds for the benefit of beneficiaries. Are there any rules that
govern a trustee vis a vis his position as an investor?
Under the common law, the trustee is only under a duty
to govern the trust funds as received. His duty was mainly as defined by a
will. In intestate succession his duty was defined by the common law. The
trustee was primarily involved in administration of land and the standard of
care required of him was that he should administer the land as he would his
own. However, with the advent of the industrial revolution towards the end of
the 18th century, the role of the trustee widened with the advent of
new forms of property e.g. capital. The
trustee’s role went beyond mere stewardship to include application of the trust
fund to enhance the benefit of the beneficiaries, both the tenants for life and
the remainderman.
The trustee’s duty however remained fiduciary in
nature but was required to act in good faith and exercise prudence and care in
his role as investor so as to result in maximum benefit to the person
beneficiaries of the trust. He had the additional duty to ensure that the
beneficiaries would get a reasonable and comparable benefit from the investment
as a trustee. The trustee was also duty bound to seek advice on the best
investment but to retain ultimate judgment in his decisions.
By the mid 19th century there had been
development of the rules requiring the trustee to invest only in authorized
investments. However, even where an investment was authorized by the law, it
was still incumbent upon the trustee to exercise due care and prudence in his
investments.
The current position
Section 4 of The
Trustee Act (Cap 167) provides for the authorized investments in which the
trustee may invest trust fund. It may be categorized into two broad classes:
(a)
Fixed interest investments; and
(b)
Wider range investments
Section 2 of the Act defines a fixed interest
investment as:
(a)
a security which under its term of issue bears a fixed
rate of interest; or
(b)
a mortgage of immovable property; or
(c)
a deposit whether fixed term or otherwise with a bank
or financial institution, building society or the Kenya Post Office Savings
Bank.
Wider range investment is defined in the schedule to
the Act as an investment other than a fixed interest security.
S 4 shows the list of authorized fixed interest
investments:
(a) any securities in which trustees in England are in the time being
authorized by English Law to invest trust funds;
(b) any securities on which is for the time being guaranteed by the UK
Government or the Kenyan Government or any public debentures issued under the
authorization of or guaranteed by any Act;
(c) any security given by a city or municipal council established under the
provision of the Local Government Act which the Minister has by Notice in the
gazette declared to be a trustee security for the purposes of the Act;
(d)any security issued
by Kenya Railways;
(e) any security or any loan to the Industrial Development Bank Limited; and
(f)
the purchase of any immovable property in Kenya held
for an estate in fee simple or for a term of years of which not less than 40
years is unexpired, and which is not subject to a rent exceeding 4% of the
unimproved value thereof.
Authorised
Wider Range Investments
(i)
Any security the price of which is quoted on a
recognized stock exchange in Kenya subject to the following qualifications:
(a) must be of a company registered under The Company Act.
(b) Its total issued and paid up capital must not be less than Kshs 10
million.
(c) The company must have paid dividends for all its shares that rank for
dividends for each of the 5 years immediately preceding the year in which the
investment is made.
(ii)
Any units or other shares of the investments subject
to the trusts, of a unit trust within the meaning of The Unit Trusts Act (Cap 521) and registered under section 7 of
that Act.
(iii)
Any shares of a building society.
Operations
of Investments
When a trustee decided to invest trust funds, he must
divide the investment into two. Rule 3 of the Schedule to The Trust Act provides
that,
A trustee may not make or retain any wider range
security unless the trust fund has been divided into 2 parts referred to as the
fixed interest part and the wider range part with the parts being equal in
value at the time of division.
Where such a division has been made, no subsequent
division of the trust funds shall be made and no property shall be transferred
from one part of the trust fund to the other unless either:
(a) The
transfer is authorized or required by the provisions of the schedule; or
(b) A compensating
transfer is made at the same time.
These requirements are intended to ensure that firstly
the investments made by the trustee are safe and that they afford a reasonable
and fair benefit to both the tenant for life and the remainderman.
Fixed interest securities are primarily attractive to
the remainderman because of the guarantee given their value. They are also
attractive to the tenant for life because of the return which, though
conservative, is guaranteed.
Wider range securities will primarily be attractive to
the tenant for life because of the high interest returns but they are also
acceptable to the remainderman because of their long term appreciation.
[Must consult Rules 3,4,5,6 and 7 in the Schedule].
Investment Account
Fixed interest Securities
No.
|
Date
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Reference
|
1.
|
1.1.2006
|
Fixed deposit in KCB account, 1 year fixed interest
|
2,000,000
|
Memorandum
Cash
|
2.
|
2.3.2006
|
Rental property o LR
no. xxx
|
5,000,000
|
Mem.
Sch. of Assets
Cash
|
3.
|
3.3.2006
|
Treasury bonds
|
1,000,000
|
Xxx
|
Wider range securities
No.
|
Date
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Reference
|
1.
|
xxx
|
Shares
|
xxx
|
Xxx
|
2.
|
xxx
|
Unit trusts
|
xxx
|
Xxx
|
xxx
|
Apportionment Account
Apportionment refers to the need to distribute the
proceeds between the various beneficiaries of the Estate who have different
entitlements under the law.
At common law, the tenant for life was only entitled
to interest on money lent out of the estate. Any other income was presumed to
be an appreciation on capital and was therefore the property of the
remainderman. This situation was obviously unfair to the tenant for life
because their were other forms of income which in time were comparable to
interest on money lent out. Consequently, statutory attempts were made to
remedy this position culminating in The
Apportionment Act 1870 which now makes provision as to how apportionment is
to be made.
This Act is a statute of general application in Kenya
pursuant to The Judicature Act provisions.
Section 2 of this Act provides that all rents, dividends and other periodical
payments in the nature of income are like interest on money lent out to be
considered as accruing from day to day and accordingly to be apportioned in
respect of time.
Apportionment may now be analysed under two
categories:
Statutory apportionment
Is the allocation of income accruing to the estate to 2 or more
beneficiaries on the basis of time. Where there is only 1 beneficiary, the
question of apportionment does not arise. Similarly, where there is no dispute
as to whether income relates to the period prior to and after the death of the
deceased. The trustee must address 2 questions in this regard:
(a) to what period of time does the
income relate? When did it accrue?
(b) When was the income actually
received by the estate?
Once these questions have been answered, the following guidelines apply
to apportionment.
(i)
All income received prior to the testator’s death will be treated as
capital income irrespective of the period to which it relates e.g. if the
deceased had entered into a tenancy agreement in relation to some property
forming part of the estate for the period say 1.10.2005 to 30.9.2006, at a
monthly rent of Kshs 10,000 payable in full in advance and the money was
received on 1.10.2005 and the deceased died on 1.1.2006.
(a) Moneys accruing to the estate
prior to the deceased’s death are treated as capital irrespective of when the
cash is actually received.
(b) In addition, if the income
accrues prior to the testator’s death, it will be regarded as capital
irrespective of the period to which it relates.
[This example will be question four in the exam].
Onyango enters into a lease agreement covering the
period 1.10.2005 to 31.10.2006. He agrees with Rashid, the lessee, that the
monthly rent payable shall be Kshs 60,000 p.m. Onyango dies in an accident on
6.1.2006 and he has appointed you the executor of his will. How do you
apportion income in the following situations:
(a)
Rashid had paid the 6 months rent
in advance on 1.10.2005;
(b)
The lease only provided for
payment of one month’s rent in advance;
(c)
1 month’s rent was payable in
advance but no rent had been paid at the time of the testator’s death. The
entire rent is paid on 31.3.2006;
(d)
The lease agreement is silent as
to the time of payment of monthly rent and no payment has been paid to date.
Equitable Apportionment
Courts of equity have stated that where statutory
apportionment does not achieve a fair distribution of the proceeds of the
estate, equity may intervene to achieve a more just apportionment.
These rules attempt to interpret the best wishes of
the deceased that may not have been expressly provided in the instrument
appointing the trustee/executor.
Howe v Earl of Dartmouth (1802) 7 Ves 137
Where, on the death of the deceased there is residuary
personalty which is to be enjoyed by persons in succession, the trustee is
under a duty to convert into money such parts of the residuary personalty that
may be of wasting, future or reversionary character or which constitute
unauthorized securities. After payment of general and testamentary expenses
relating to the estate of the deceased, the trustee should invest the balance
in authorized securities.
However, the testator may expressly empower the
executor to postpone the need to convert as contemplated in Howe’s case.
Re Fawcett (1940) Ch 447
Where there is a duty to convert in accordance with
the rule in Howe’s case, and there is no specific power to postpone conferred
on the executor, the issue of apportionment of income for the period between
the death of the testator and the actual conversion of the assets will be
governed by the rule in Re Fawcett.
Between the death of the testator and the actual
conversion, the trustee will provide a notional valuation of the assets and
apply a base rate of interest as income accruing to the tenant for life at the
end of the period.
Re Beech (1920) 1 Ch
The recommended rate of interest should be 4%.
Re Parry (1947) Ch 41
The rule in Re
Parry states that where a will gives an executor the power to postpone
the conversion and the executor exercises that power, then for purposes of
determining the income to be given to the tenant for life, the value of the
estate will be presumed to be the value at the testator’s death. Interest will
be 4%.
Earl of Chesterfield’s Trust (1883) 24 Ch 643.
Where an asset is subject to conversion in accordance
with the rule in Earl’s case, but it earns no income and the executor has
either exercised the right of conversion or has postponed conversion, then at
the time when conversion is actually done, income is to be computed as follows:
the proceeds of the conversion are assumed to have both portions of
capital and income and in order to determine the income portion, it is assumed
that the capital element was invested at the time of death at its value then
and that it has accrued interest in the interim period. That interest is to be
calculated on a compounded basis between time of death and conversion.
[Photocopy:
The Advocate’s Accounts Rules
The Advocate’s Deposit Rules
The Advocate’s Accountancy Certificate Rules
All at the back of The Advocates Act
[Look at Rowland’s for examples of calculating the
apportionments for different kinds of income. Also look at The Advocates Act
since Advocate’s Accounts Rules etc will be in the exam].
Distribution Account
Trustee’s Role
(i)
Secure assets and establish liabilities.
(ii)
Administer trust funds efficiently/lawfully.
(iii)
Distribute the deceased estate to legitimate
beneficiaries in accordance with the applicable law.
·
Pay of all liabilities to bona fide creditors;
·
Distribute the balance to rightful beneficiaries
Factors to Consider
1. Under s 24 of The Trustee’s Act, the trustee is at
liberty to exercise the power of advancement of any part of the estate to any
of the remaindermen so long as this will be taken into account at the time of
distributing the net estate.
This is statutory
recognition of the doctrine hotchpot. This
is an accounting method of distributing property to persons taking into account
property that you had disposed off to them earlier.
2. All the accounts in the
Estate Book should be closed and the balances brought to the distribution
account.
3. Establish the authenticity
of each of the claims and compute their respective entitlements in accordance
with the law.
4. The trustee will seek to
have the beneficiaries reach an agreement on the mode of distribution of the
estate e.g. the beneficiaries may agree to share out the estate in specie and
any shortfalls or surpluses of any beneficiaries to be offset in cash.
Example 1
Mr Omondi, a widower, dies intestate leaving 3 sons,
John Peter and Michael who are all aged over 18 years. Under The Law of
Succession Act, the late Omondi’s estate falls to be distributed amongst his 3
sons equally. The net estate comprises the following:
i.
House LR xx Nairobi 3
million;
ii.
Motor vehicle 2
million;
iii.
Cash in bank 100,
000
iv.
Ordinary shares in X ltd 10,0000
v.
Personal effects 410,000
vi.
Estate owes Mortgage debts 500,000
vii.
Legal fees 10,000
It is decided between all the beneficiaries that John
will take the house in specie and
Peter the shares in specie. Draw up
the distribution account.
In the Estate of Mr
Omondi (Deceased)
Distribution Account
No.
|
Particulars
|
Ref.
|
Amount
|
No.
|
Particulars
|
Ref.
|
Amount
|
1.
|
House on LR xxx Nairobi
|
Sch
Mem.
|
3,000,000
|
1.
|
Mortgage debt
|
Xxx
|
500,000
|
2.
|
Motor Vehicle
|
xxx
|
2,000,000
|
2.
|
Legal Fees
|
Xxx
|
10,000
|
3.
|
Cash in Bank
|
xxx
|
100,000
|
3.
|
John’s Share (House less paid to estate)
|
Xxx
|
1,700,000
|
4.
|
Shares
|
xxx
|
100,000
|
4.
|
Peter’s share
|
Xxx
|
1700000
|
5.
|
Personal effects
|
xxx
|
410,000
|
5.
|
Michael’s share
|
Xxx
|
1700000
|
5,610,000
|
5,610,000
|
Workings
1. John’s
Share
House –
paid to estate 3000000
1300000
1700000
2. Peter’s
share
Shares
+ estate 100000
1600000
1700000
Example 2
Michael dies leaving a will under which his 3
children, Naomi, Leah and Rachel are given equal shares of the residual estate.
Before the estate is wound up, Rachel requires funds to set up a medical
practice and is advanced 200,000 from the estate. The Net Estate comprises
1. House in
Nakuru 2000000
2. Personal
effects 100000
3. Cash in
Bank 100000
4. Shares 300000
5. Mortgage
debt 500000
6. Legal
fees 25000
The beneficiaries have agreed that the mortgage debt
will be taken over by Naomi who also takes the house in specie. Leah will take
the personal effects and the KCB shares will be transferred to Rachel. Draw up
the distribution account.
In the Estate of Michael (Deceased)
Distribution Account
No.
|
Particulars
|
Ref.
|
Amount
|
No.
|
Particulars
|
Ref.
|
Amount
|
1.
|
House on LR xxx Nakuru
|
Sch
Mem.
|
2,000,000
|
1.
|
Mortgage debt
|
xxx
|
500,000
|
2.
|
Personal effects
|
xxx
|
100,000
|
2.
|
Legal Fees
|
xxx
|
25,000
|
3.
|
Cash in Bank
|
xxx
|
100,000
|
3.
|
Rachel’s Share (House less paid to estate)
|
xxx
|
1,250,000
|
4.
|
Shares
|
xxx
|
300,000
|
4.
|
Naomi’s share
|
xxx
|
725000
|
5.
|
Advancement to Rachel
|
xxx
|
200,000
|
5.
|
Leah’s share
|
xxx
|
725000
|
2,700,000
|
2,700,000
|
*[Must show workings]
nicely explained the topic "Legal Services" same as you mention about is quite popular these days in the united kingdom, our company provides services for the same kindly visit to know more: Company Administration Services Uk
ReplyDeleteIn the awesome scheme of things you’ll receive an A just for hard work. Exactly where you misplaced me was on your details. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And it couldn’t be more accurate right here. Having said that, permit me reveal to you what exactly did work. The writing can be really convincing which is possibly why I am taking an effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, despite the fact that I can certainly notice the leaps in logic you make, I am not confident of how you seem to connect the details which in turn produce the actual final result. For the moment I will, no doubt yield to your point but wish in the near future you link the facts much better. محامي الدمام
ReplyDelete