Showing posts with label LAW OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LAW OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Show all posts

GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS IN KENYA AND HOW THE LAW APPLY TO THE GMOs




Genetically modified organism (often abbreviated as GMOs) are simply living organism – plants and animals, whose genetical material has been modified.  There are two ways to do this:
ü  Traditional selection and breeding (much like breeding animals),
ü  Modern, scientific modification of the crops.
They are those organisms whose genetic material or DNA has been deliberately altered to incorporate genes from another species. According to the Human Genome Project, GMOs are designed to confer certain advantages to the plants and animals in question.

The controversy over the use of genetically modified organisms has increased as its use has increased in recent years. The creators of GMOs use the best genes to create organisms that perform to their intentions, especially fruit and vegetables. Opponents of GMOs do not like the idea of eating plants that have not been created naturally and feel that messing with natural processes will be harmful in the long run.

The GMO debate in Kenya has been characterized by a lot of misinformation. Lets trace the debate:

Advantages of GMO
ü  Less Environmental Impact: Some food crops have many negative environmental impacts due to erosion, irrigation needs and the heavy use of pesticides and herbicides. According to the Human Genome Project, GMO crops have been designed to specifically address these issues. Crops that are resistant to disease and insects require fewer harmful chemicals. Plants that are engineered to be drought-resistant require less irrigation, which both conserves water and lessens erosion.
ü  Less pesticide is needed to be used due to insect pest resistant plants.
ü  More economically friendly as pesticides do not go into the air, soil, and water (especially freshwater supplies). Their production hazards to the environment also decreases.
ü  Decrease in costs of growing and farming, due to the reduced use of pesticides.
ü  Greater Yields: GMO food crops have been genetically altered to have shorter growing cycles, greater resistance to both insects and disease, higher yields, and higher nutritional value. GMO animals have increased production as well. For example, dairy cows may produce more milk. The World Health Organization, or WHO, states that the higher yields afforded by GMO plants and animals may allow food prices to drop while food sources become more abundant.
ü  Farmers have more income, which they could spend on such things as, for example, the education of their children.
ü  Less deforestation needed to feed the worlds growing population (UN projections say that the world population will reach 8.15 billion compared to 6.18 billion in year 2000). This decreases carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which in turn slows global warming.
ü  Decrease in food prices due to lower costs and higher yield. As people in poor countries spend over half of their income on food alone, lower food prices mean an automatic reduction of poverty.
ü  Less starvation in the world due to decreased food prices.
ü  More nutritious. This has been proven and tested many times.
ü  Rigorous testing of ALL GMO crops and products. This makes GMOs much safer than organic (the traditional) crops.
ü  Scientific development of agriculture, health and related sciences due to the better understanding of the products. For example, the development of new medicines.
ü  Creation of “super foods” due to better knowledge. Super foods are types of food that are cheap to produce, grow fast in large quantities, highly nutritious.
ü  New products. For examples, scientist identified the gene responsible for caffeine in coffee beans; by excluding this gene, decaffeinated coffee beans can be grown naturally.
ü  Developments of new kinds of crops that can be grown at extreme climates, for example, dry or freezing environments (like deserts). For example, scientist developed a type of tomato that grows in salty soil.

Disadvantages of GMO
ü  Safety: Opponents of GMO foods raise two concerns regarding their safety: the introduction of new allergens, and the creation of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, sometimes called “superbugs.” As genes are inserted into one species from another, new proteins will be made that may have the ability to cause allergic reactions in some people. Additionally, the technology used to create GMO foods relies on inserting antibiotic-resistance genes into some plants, according to the Human Genome Project. It is possible that during digestion, these genes could become inserted into bacteria that live in the gut and cause antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Should these bacteria infect animals and humans, our resources to fight them would be diminished.
ü  Contamination: Because sun, wind, water, birds and insects are not bound by property lines, there is concern that cross-pollination may occur between GMO crops and non-GMO crops in the vicinity, with the result that genetic alterations may be inadvertently introduced to the non-GMO crops. Certainly for the farmer who has chosen to grow non-GMO foods, this would be seen as a great disadvantage.
ü  Loss of Biodiversity: With all of the advantages offered to farmers by GMO foods, such as greater yields and decreased energy needs, there is legitimate concern that agriculture will become dominated by crops and animals that have been genetically modified. This could translate to a loss in biodiversity, meaning that many other varieties of plants and animals will no longer be available.
ü  They contribute to lifestyle diseases
ü  Major trading countries that obtain most of the benefit from the production and trade of genetically modified crops. This might cause more geopolitical conflicts.
ü  Cross-pollination with traditional, organic plants. Cross pollination can occur at quite large distances. New genes may also be included in the offspring of the traditional, organic crops miles away. This makes it difficult to distinguish which crop field is organic, and which is not, posing a problem to the proper labeling of non-GMO food products.
ü  Harm to other organisms. For example genes and their effect included in a crop may turn out to be poisonous to insects (monarch butterfly poisoned by GMO corns).
ü  Taste of GMOs are not as good or “natural.”
ü  Spread of new, more resistant “super weeds”
ü  Spread of new, more resistant “super pests.”
ü  New trade, tariff and quota issues may arise between countries, regions.
ü  Unharmonized test-, and safety standards around the world.
ü  Widening corporate size gaps between food producing giants and smaller ones. This might cause a consolidation in the market: fewer competitors increase the risk of oligopolies, which might increase food prices.
ü  Allergies may become more intense, and also, new allergy types may develop.
ü  Discrepancies in information flow. GMO producers stress the benefits, but are reluctant to talk about risks and dangers.

Discussion point: should we allow GMOs in Kenya????

The law on GMOs in Kenya
Kenya enacted Biosafety Act of 2009, allowing import and trade in GMos. Kenya is the fourth country in Africa to have GMO-ready Laws. Other countries include South Africa, Burkina Faso and Egypt. In a Legal Notice dated June 22, 2011 acting Higher Education, Science and Technology Minister Hellen Sambili gazette the effective date as July 1.

The Act is consistent with the provisions and requirements of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The Biosafety Act, 2009 states its objectives as:
ü  Facilitate responsible research and minimize potential risks that may be posed by modern biotechnology activities including GMOs
ü  Ensure an adequate level of protection in the field of safe transfer, handling and use of GMO’s that may have an adverse effect on human health and environment.
ü  Establish a transparent science-based and predictable process to review and make decisions on modern biotechnology activities.
ü  Ensure the definitions used in the interpretations of the Act are similar to those used in the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena protocol.

It deals with applications for contained use, field trials, exportation and importation and placement on the market. It is not clear where food aid which Kenya gets from Europe, America and Canada would fall in these categories especially in light of the fact that GMOs intended for use as food, feed and for processing are exempt from the advance informed agreement procedures in the Cartagena Protocol.

The Act also establishes a National Biosafety Authority to administer the Act.  The membership of the Authority comprises of representatives of the National Environment Management Authority, Kenya Bureau of Standards, and National Council for Science and Technology, the Department of Veterinary Services, Kenya Plant Health inspectorate Service, Ministries of Finance and Science and Technology among others.  The Authority is empowered to: consider and determine applications for approval for the transfer, handling and use of genetically modified organisms, and related activities in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Section 18(1) demands that a person shall not conduct any activity involving genetically modified organisms without the written approval of the Authority. Section 19( 1 ) provides that a person shall n o t introduce into the environment a genetically modified organism without the written approval of the Authority. Section 20(1) provides that a person shall not import into Kenya a genetically modified organism without the written approval of the Authority. Section 21(1) stipulates that a person shall not place on the market  a genetically modified organism without the written approval of the Authority. Section 22(1) demands that a person transporting through Kenya modified organisms in transit, which are not destined for use in Kenya, apply for a written approval of such transportation from the Authority and ensure that the GMOs  are properly packaged and transported in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed and any applicable international standards.

Finally, Section 23 provides that a person intending to export a genetically modified organism from Kenya shall provide the Authority with an advance written consent granted by a relevant authority of the country to which the genetically modified organism is destined, to the effect that such relevant authority has no objection to the intended exportation.

To address safety concerns, Section 27 provides for a risk assessment, that should take into account available information concerning any known risk posed by potential exposure to a genetically modified organism. Further, Section 31(1) empowers the Authority to suspend or revoke any approval given under this Act where the person who has been granted such approval is in contravention of any of the conditions imposed on the grant of the approval, or the provisions of the Act.


Moreover, Section 39 requires a regulatory agency with knowledge of an unintentional or unapproved introduction into the environment of a genetically modified organism that is likely to pose biosafety risks to, within twenty-four hours of knowledge of the introduction, notify the Authority of the occurrence. The Authority may then, under Section 40, issue and serve on any person a restoration order in respect of any matter relating to release of a genetically modified organism into the environment. Under Section 42, if the Authority determines that there is an imminent danger posed to the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking into account risks to the human health, in consultation with the relevant regulatory agency, it may issue an order for the immediate cessation of an approved activity, or for the immediate imposition of additional risk management measures with respect to such activity.

Part VII of the Act provides for appointment of bio-safety inspectors, with powers to enter without a warrant any premises, facility, vessel or property which the inspector has reason to believe it is necessary for him to enter in order to ascertain whether the requirements of this Act or any approval under the Act are being complied with,

Finally, Section 51 authorizes the Minister, in consultation with the Authority, to make regulations on; 
ü  procedures for conducting contained use activities involving genetically modified organisms;
ü  procedures for release of genetically modified organisms into the environment;
ü  procedures for importation a n d exportation of genetically modified organisms;
ü  procedures for genetically modified organisms in transit;
ü  procedure for handling, packaging, transporting and labeling genetically modified organisms.
The Act thus in allowing for GMOs in enya place sthe necessary safeguards to ensure safety in use of GMOs.

Discussion: Are these safeguards sufficient?

Section 52 provides a penalty, on conviction in any offence related to GMOs, of a fine not exceeding twenty million shillings, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, or both. The offences include making contained use of, releasing into the environment, placing on the market and importing or exporting a genetically modified organism without the approval of the Authority;

Discussion: is the penalty deterrent enough?

Conclusion
Kenya allows GMOs in Kenya, but with the necessary precautions

Internationally GMOPs are regulated vide he CBD and Cartagena Protocol, discussed in the last class. They allow the use of GMOs but provide for safety measures.

Quiz
How does the Kenyan Biosafety Act implement the Cartagena Protocol?
Discuss the weaknesses in the regulatory regime for GMOs in Kenya
Propose legal reforms on how the above weaknesses can be addressed?

REFERENCES

  1. The Biosafety Act 2009 & The Biosafety Regulations 2011.
  2. Convention or Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992.
  3. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety 2000.
  4. National Environment Management and Co-ordination Act (NEMCA).



THE LAW ON ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS




ELECTRONIC CASH

What is electronic cash? One author has defined it as:

“Monetary value charged and stored on an electronic support, in the form of a smart card or incorporated into the memory of a computer” (Batalla 2001, p. 81).

 

The European Union Directive on Electronic Money 2000/46/EU: Article 1 (3)(b) gives a definition that is a technologically elite version of the traditional notion of a legal tender. According to it, electronic cash is:

“Monetary value as represented by a claim on the issuer which is:

(i) stored on an electronic device;

(ii) issued on receipt of funds of an amount not less in value than the monetary value issued;

(iii) accepted as a means of payment by undertakings other than the issuer”.

 

Current Regulations

The Banking Act does provide the basis of regulating products offered by non-banks. The Central Bank of Kenya Act gives the Regulator the general authority to formulate, and implement such “policies as best promote the establishment, regulation and supervision of efficient and effective payment, clearing and settlement systems”.[1] 

The National Payment System Act, 2011[2], has its main objective as to consolidate and extend CBK’s authority over payment systems of all kinds.

A case study of the Mpesa launch by Safaricom Limited in March 2007, Central Bank of Kenya’s approval for the registration was sought. It was clear from the onset to CBK that there was no legislative framework by which it would purport to license Safaricom to launch the product. The then acting Governor agreed to issue a "letter of no objection” indicating that CBK would allow the service to launch provided that the following conditions were met including; firstly, appropriate measures were put in place to safeguard the integrity of the system to protect customers against fraud, loss of money and loss of privacy. Secondly, the system would provide adequate measures to guard against money laundering. Thirdly, proper records were kept and availed to the Regulator. Fourthly, Mpesa would observe all existing laws governing its relationship with its agents and customers.

 

Draft E-Money Regulations

In December 2008, the then Minister of Finance, John Michuki, requested the Central Bank of Kenya to undertake an audit of Mpesa that was run by Safaricom. Michuki is quoted as saying “I do not know whether Mpesa will end up well”[3]. An audit was carried out by the Central Bank of Kenya, which although was satisfied with the workings of Mpesa, recognized the gap in the regulatory framework in Kenya regarding mobile payment services. Subsequently, on 27 January 2009, the Central Bank of Kenya issued a statement to the public that sought to give confidence to the market that Mpesa was operating safely in Kenya.

The Governor of CBK launched draft Electronic Retail Transfers Regulations and Electronic Money Issuers Regulations in February 2011. These Regulations were being proposed as a stop gap regulatory measure pending the enactment of the National Payments Systems Bill 2009, which has since been enacted. However, the CBK has never gazetted the regulations, and neither has the Act been fully operationalized.

According to Prof Njuguna Ndun’gu, the Governor of Central Bank of Kenya, the Regulator recognized the need to ensure adequate risk mitigation especially through the formulation and implementation of regulatory and oversight policies that govern mobile phone and mobile banking services.[4] For the Regulations to be effective there was need to prudential guidelines in policy and oversight activities of relevant payment system operators and regulators. Central Bank of Kenya issued Regulations for the retail payments sub-sector of the National Payments System. The main objective of issuing regulations was to ensure that E-Money issuers and payments service providers conduct their businesses prudently and in accordance with the provisions of the Central Bank of Kenya Act.

On 1 September 2010, the Central Bank of Kenya held a workshop for the main players in the industry and came up with two sets of Regulations namely; Electronic Retail Transfers and E-Money Issuers Regulations. The main objectives of these Regulations were to; firstly, define retail transfers and provide for the delivery of retail transfers by banks and financial institutions as well as persons who were not licensed as banks or financial institutions.

The Second objective was to facilitate the provision of electronic payment services without compromising the safety and efficiency of National Payment System. The third objective was to provide minimum standards for consumer protection and risk management to be adhered to by all providers of retail transfers. The fourth objective was to provide for the authorization of e-money issuers and the conduct of the business of e-money issuers and the registration of such agents as well as rules of engagement. The fifth objective was to provider for the appointment of agents by e-money issuers and the registration of such agents as well as rules of engagement. Lastly, to provide for the appropriate measures to protect the interest of the clients of e-money issuers

The Central Bank of Kenya developed the National payments System Act, which aims to enhance further the regulations and supervision of payments systems and payment service providers. The proposed E-Money Regulations are meant for use by the industry while the National Payments System Act will reinforce them.

 

Analysis of the E-Money Regulations

The draft E-Money Regulations propose to regulate the relationship between the Central Bank of Kenya (‘the Regulator”) and the Mobile Money Service Providers (“the issuers”) on one hand, and the relationship between the Mobile Money Service Providers (“the issuers”) and the Customers on the other hand.

The Regulator and Issuers Relationship

The draft E-Money Regulations have attempted to define and now regulate the relationship between Central Bank of Kenya (“the Regulator”) and the Service Providers (“the Issuer”) in the following ways;

Firstly, the Regulator approves and grants licences[5] to the issuers. The requirements for a licence include that one has to be a limited liability company, the Board of Directors has to adequately reflect the balance of interests of the issuer, a core capital of KShs 60m, financial stability, experienced persons proposed to control the issuer possess, minimum controls including proper administrative and accounting procedures and technology systems, effective audit functions and adequate business recovery plans. A licencing fee of KShs 50,000 is applicable.

One of the critiques of the above requirement is that the issuer’s Board of Directors only cater for the interests of the issuer whilst none will look after the interests of the customers. Another critique of the is that a core capital of KShs 60m is lower than the average value of mobile money transfer transactions per month.

Secondly, small e-money lenders[6] are to be registered. A small e-money lender refers to a person who issues e-money on a small scale and whose transactions are limited to a maximum of KShs 10,000. The requirements for licensing are more lenient than those applicable to issuers as one has to be a company, and ensure that their liabilities are less than KShs 100m. In addition, no application fees are payable. This will assist especially the Saccos that lend money to their members.

Thirdly, on compliance requirements applicable to e-money issuers[7], limits are imposed on the transaction amounts for each e-money account with one individual transaction not exceeding KShs 75,000 and a monthly limit of KShs 1m. In addition, the issuers are to ensure that their systems maintain accurate records of the customers. The issuers and their agents must also comply with the provisions of the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-money Laundering Act. In addition, the issuer should enter into a contract with its customers identifying the issuer providing the service. However the Regulations do not make it mandatory for the contract to state the specific obligations of the issuer to the customer.

Issuers, other than banks and financial institutions are not allowed to engage in lending or investment activity. Issuers have to obtain the Regulator’s approval prior to making any changes in the scope or nature of the e-money payment instrument for example by adding a new functionality of the instrument.

The Regulations provide that the issuer’s liquid assets[8], including the balance held at the bank, must be equal to the amount of outstanding e-money issued. Issuers are expected to carry out daily reconciliations of transactions between the liquid assets held by the bank, monies redeemed during the day by 4pm of every day.

 

The Issuers and Agents Relationship[9]

The Regulations recognise that agents may be appointed by the issuers who must then put in place mechanisms to regulate them. The issuer must inform the Regulator of its intention to appoint agents and in particular the procedure for recruiting the agents, their proposed locations, policies governing the agents including anti-money laundering controls, security measures to be adopted by the agents and training of the agents.

A case study of how Safaricom manages its agents indicates that proper regular training of the agents is carried out and its managers monitor the retail agents on a monthly basis with on-site visits. A major challenge being faced is the availability of the agents’ working capital in ensuring that there is sufficient capital to meet the customers’ requests for withdrawals.

The requirements to be appointed as an agent include possessing the proper business registration, expertise to provide agency services and being financially sound.

The Issuer and Customer Relationship [10]

Firstly on Disclosure, the issuer needs to disclose to the customer any information relating to fees applicable, that e-money may be redeemed at any time at par value, that e-money does not earn interest and that it is not a savings  account or investment instrument, that e-money is not a deposit and available customer care procedures.

Secondly, the issuer is obliged to provide written confirmation to the customer of the details of his balance in his account if so requested within thirty days. This is akin to the current bank practices.

Thirdly, the issuer is obliged to establish a customer care system to deal with customer complaints from customers. Customers may file complaints which must be addressed within sixty days. At the time of making the complaints the customer has to be advised of the expected investigations and estimated date of resolving the complaint. The customers have to be advised of the outcome of any investigations.

However, the issuer may levy additional charges for handling complains when the investigation requires retrieval of records which are more than three years old. Any such charges have to be agreed upon by the customer. This regulation may discourage customers from reporting any complaints which are more than three years old.

Fourthly, if any customer is aggrieved by a decision arrived to by an issuer; the customer may appeal to another person in the issuer’s company. This appeal mechanism, though a step in resolving customer’s grievances, may not be very effective as the appeal is to be made to a person in the same issuer’s company. 

Fifthly, issuers are obliged to provide assistance to people with disabilities to ensure that they are able to assess the complaint handling process and in lodging the complaints. Sixthly[11], the issuer is liable to the customers for any acts of the agents which have been performed within the scope of the agency agreement. This might lead to less negligence by the issuer’s agents.

 

Recommendations for Inclusion in the Draft E-Money Regulations

Firstly, the Regulations do not limit the costs to the customers to transfer of money between different service providers. This means that the issuers can, at their own discretion levy any charges as they deem fit for the use of this service. This leaves the customers at the mercy of the issuers.

Secondly, the Regulations have not provided for harmonization between the issuers networks. Currently, one cannot send money directly from Safaricom Mpesa to Airtel’s Zap from one’s phone without going through an agent. Also, such a transfer of funds is subject to hefty charges. Service providers are now proposing that Central Bank of Kenya should establish a clearing house that will process all the transactions from all four mobile money transfer platforms namely M-pesa, Zap, Yucash or orange money and send it directly to the recipient’s cellphone[12]. Although, this move has been strongly opposed as it is seen as a plan by other service providers to take advantage of the already existing Safaricom network of Mpesa.

Thirdly, even though the Regulations expressly provide that the mobile money transfers are not a savings or investment product which do not earn any interest, the common practice is that most ordinary citizens, especially the unbanked customers are storing money in their e-money accounts. This means that the service providers can play a role in mobilizing community savings. However, this can only be done through strategic partnerships with banks and other financial institutions[13].

Fourthly, in the event that the issuers were to go into liquidation, the customers would lose the money which is in their mobile e-money accounts. The Investor Compensation Fund does not recognise these customers and would not be able to compensate them. The Regulations are also silent on this.

Fifthly, in the event of the demise of an e-mobile customer, what happens to the monies in his transaction account? Whilst, the Unclaimed Financial Assets Act, does not define monies in the e-mobiles as part of unclaimed assets, the Minister of Finance[14] is authorized to prescribe other classes of assets for inclusion which in time could include e-money is one’s mobile. My proposal is that the Regulations should provide for the means by which the money can be transmitted to the customer’s next of kin.

Non implementation
Despite the regulations being agreed upon by stakeholders, they have never been gazette by CBK, leaving a lacuna in law. The fear may have been CBK Act did not give express authority to regulate mobile cash. However, the National Payment Systems Act now gives such authority. CBK should publish the regulations under this Act.

CHEQUE TRUNCATION
Cheque truncation is a new system of cheque clearing and settlement between banks based on images and associated electronic payment data, without the physical exchange of the cheques. The clearing and settlement system that makes use of images and electronic payment data. It does not rely on the exchange of physical cheques. Cheques will no longer be taken to the automated clearing house by courier. Telecommunication links will be used by banks and their branches to send cheque data for settlement.

How does Cheque Truncation work?
The customer will draw a cheque and present it to the bank. The bank where this cheque is deposited is known as the collecting bank.

The collecting bank will take the image of the cheque leaf that has been presented and also read the information line with the magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) code on the cheque.

They then send the captured images and data to the central clearing house. The Clearing House processes the data and arrives at the settlement figure for the participating banks and send the required data to payee/drawee banks for processing at their end. They also send the net settlement figures of each participating bank to the Central Bank of Kenya, also a member of the Clearing House, for debiting or crediting the participant's account.
NB:
  • It is the responsibility of the drawee bank Capture System to process the inward data and images and generate the return file for unpaid instruments.
  • The law requires that the physical instruments be stored for a statutory period. Therefore, it is obligatory for the presenting bank to warehouse the physical instruments for that statutory period. However, in case a customer desires to get a paper instrument back, the instrument can be sourced from the presenting bank through the drawee bank.
  • Only members of the clearing House can participate in the Cheque Truncation System.

The new cheque truncation system is relevant for Kenya shillings and domestic foreign currency cheques drawn on Kenyan banks. This includes United States, Euro and Sterling Pound cheques.

Why are banks implementing the Cheque Truncation System?
The Central Bank of Kenya together with the Kenya Bankers Association developed a National Payments Strategy paper in which the modernization of the financial sector is a key deliverable. The implementation of Cheque Truncation was the next logical step in this modernization, following the automation of the Clearing House in 1997. Due to the state of telecommunications at that time, the implementation cost was prohibitive. With the recent improvements in infrastructure and reduction of the high cost of data transmission, time is ripe to implement this phase of the process.

The leveraging of the communication infrastructure removes the need to physically move cheques to the Clearing House, and reduces the time taken to process the cheques as well as courier costs.

Cheque truncation also reduces the possibilities of cheque substitution, further reducing the avenues for fraud.

Advantages for Bank cheque truncation system in Kenya
  • Cheque truncation will reduce the time it takes to transmit data between banks.
  • The time saved will reduce the clearing time
  • There will be accurate reconciliation of accounts
  • Paperwork will be minimal.
  • Fraud avenues emanating from cheque substitution will be reduced because of the elimination of physical movement of cheques. Any changes on the cheque leaf can be detected.
  • The liquidity of the economy will be generally improved because of the reduction of the clearing cycle. The time taken to clear funds will be faster ensuring funds circulate in the economy at faster rates.

Legal basis
It is a payment system, under regulation of CBK under the National Payment Systems Act 2011.

DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Kenya Information and Communication Act (KICA) defines electronic signatures thus;
“electronic signature” means data in electronic form affixed to or logically associated with other electronic data which may be used to identify the signatory in relation to the data message and to indicate the signatory’s approval of the information contained in the data message;

The Act grants legal recognition of electronic signatures in Kenya in section 83P thus;
83P. Where any law provides that information or any other matter shall be authenticated by affixing a signature or that any document shall be signed or bear the signature of any person, then, notwithstanding anything contained in that law, such requirement shall be deemed to have been satisfied if such information is authenticated by means of an advanced electronic signature affixed in such manner as may be prescribed by the Minister.

As per section 83(O)(3), The electronic signature is only valid if;
(a) it is generated through a signature-creation device;
(b) the signature creation data are, within the context in which they are used, linked to the signatory and to no other person;
(c) the signature creation data were, at the time of signing, under the control of the signatory and of no other person;
(d) any alteration to the electronic signature made after the time of signing is detectable; and
(e) where the purpose of the legal requirement for a signature is to provide assurance as to the integrity of the information to which it relates, any alteration made to that information after the time of signing, is detectable.

However, as per section 83B(1) electronic signatures are not allowed for;
(a) the creation or execution of a will;
(b) negotiable instruments;
(c) documents of title.
As per 83B(2) The Minister may by order modify the provisions of sub-section (1) by adding or removing any class of transactions or matters.

The Communications Commission of Kenya (CCK) is in this law empowered to facilitate and regulate electronic certification services by issuing licenses to prospective certification service providers (defined as an entity or a legal or a natural person who issues certificates or provides other services related to electronic signatures).

The law creates an opportunity for local entrepreneurs (and foreign service providers) to go into provision of digital signatures and certification. This will bring such services closer to Kenyan corporates and consumers who have previously had to services from European and North American providers amidst legal and logistical hardship.

ELECTRONIC BANKING
ATM’s
An automated teller machine or automatic teller machine (ATM) is a cash machine; a computerised telecommunications device that provides the clients of a financial institution with access to financial transactions in a public space without the need for a cashier, human clerk or bank teller. With ATM’s ustomers can access their bank accounts in order to make cash withdrawals, cash and cheque deposits, credit card cash advances, and check their account balances

In Kenya, ATM machines are available 24 hrs at all major banks. Recently, in September 2011, Barclays Bank of Kenya has launched a new interface on its ATMs to deliver video. The new capabilities will see the bank deliver relevant promotions through its ATM network. If you visit any Barclays ATM now, you will see the dancing ATM which is just one such promotion. All the 230 plus ATM machines in the Barclays network have been upgraded to this capability.

To reduce queues in banking halls, some banks like Equity and Family banks have even established ATM branches, especially now that ATMs can deposit cash and cheques as well as withdrawals.

Telephone banking
Telephone banking is a service provided by a financial institution, which allows its customers to perform transactions over the telephone.

Most telephone banking services use an automated phone answering system with phone keypad response or voice recognition capability. To guarantee security, the customer must first authenticate through a numeric or verbal password or through security questions asked by a live representative (see below). With the obvious exception of cash withdrawals and deposits, it offers virtually all the features of an automated teller machine: account balance information and list of latest transactions, electronic bill payments, funds transfers between a customer's accounts, etc.

Usually, customers can also speak to a live representative located in a call centre or a branch, although this feature is not always guaranteed to be offered 24/7.

Major banks in Kenya offer this service through the landline telephone system but through call centres. These services are mainly open to corporate and business club customers.

Internet Banking
Internet banking is a facility that allows you to do your banking from the comfort of your home, office or when on holiday, through the internet. Some of the services you can perform on your own include but are not limited to:
  • You can transfer cash or funds from one of your accounts to another of your account, for example, from current account to savings account.
  • You can transfer funds to someone else with an account in the same bank
  • You can set up periodic transfers or payments for loans
  • You can get you statements and view your transactions

Also all the major banks provide this service where one can log on to his/her account through an internet connection that is secured by series of authorizations and passwords.

AGENCY BANKING
Agency banking in Kenya is the new way that banking in Kenya is using to take banking services to the unbanked and under banked at a cheaper rate. The banks are training agents who will engage in banking services on behalf of the banks.
Agency banking is not new in the world. It has been used very well in Latin America and Asia. There are few African countries that have taken up agency banking. The agency banking in Kenya guidelines were enacted in 2010. Banks must first apply to central bank of Kenya to get approval to conduct agency banking business. The board of directors of each banking institution interested in agency banking must make policies guidelines and procedures to be followed to ensure that:
-          the agents are credible,
-          risk identification and mitigation measures are in place and
-          Agents are audited on an ongoing basis to ensure that the Agents follow the guidelines from central Bank, their contracts and the banking policy.

Agency banking in Kenya requirements
Agents must also through the banks that sponsor them apply to run agency banking in Kenya business. The agency banking network approval requires the following conditions to be met, together with completing the Agency Banking Network application form.
-          The proposed or expected number of agents in each province for the next three years
-          The banks must produce a report of the due diligence policy and procedures for their agencies
-          The service that the agency would provide on behalf of the bank
-          The draft generic agency contract
-          The policies, procedures and the technology the bank will apply and use at the agency outlet
-          Risk management and mitigation policies in place
-          Internal controls and audits performed prior to agents engaging in agency banking
-          Policies on anti-money laundering
Additionally the bank provides their channel, growth and business strategy for agency banking and how it fits in with the overall global strategy of the bank.

The application form for Agency banking is accompanied by a non-refundable fee of Kenya shillings 5,000. Where an application has been rejected, central bank responds to the applicant within thirty days of having received the application form the bank. After the conditions have been met, the bank can resubmit their application to central bank.
Agency banking in Kenya application

An agent application form is also sent to central bank for approval before the agent can start transacting on behalf of the bank. A fee of Kenya shillings of 1,000 per agent is required. An application is renewable annually and the fees are payable yearly. Details included in the forms include:
-          Agent Name
-          Location, postal addresses and telephone contacts
-          The business the agent carried out for the last eighteen months
-          The banking services that the agent will handle on behalf of the bank.
-          Confirmation or declaration from a senior member of the prospective agency stating the minimum qualifications required have been met.

Agency banking in Kenya approved activities.
Activities that the agency can engage are determined by the bank after assessment of the agency.  The agency does not have to perform all the activities. These include but are not limited to:
-          Cash withdrawal and deposits
-          Repayments of loans
-          Bills payment
-          Salary payments
-          Funds transfer
-          Balance enquiry
-          Document collection for debit and credit cards, loan applications and account opening forms
-          Cheque book requests and collection
-          Collection of bank correspondence and mail
-          Mobile banking services
Agency banking transactions are denominated in Kenya shillings.

Activities prohibited for agency banking in Kenya
Some activities are prohibited and are listed below. When an agency continues to perform prohibited activities, their contract may be terminated. The list below is not exhaustive.
-          Perform and carry out transactions when the networks and communication failure is experienced.
-          The transaction must have acknowledgement or receipt.
-          Charge customers any fees
-          Carrying out agency banking business when agent is no longer a going concern
-          Offer its own banking services apart from the sponsoring bank
-          Anti-money laundering services
-          Foreign exchange transactions
-          En-cashing and depositing of cheques
-          Provision of cash advances and loans
-          Subcontracting to any business to run its agency banking

Agency banking in Kenya termination of services
A bank or central bank may terminate an agency contract. The bank that had registered the agent must inform the general public by posting the most appropriate notice around the premises or vicinity of the agent. A contract for agency banking may be terminated when the agent:
-          When the agent is no longer a going concern
-          The agent suffers damage or financial loss that is not remedied after three months
-          is involved in criminal activities, fraud and financial mismanagement
-          is declared bankrupt by the courts and is being wound up
-          death of a sole proprietor or mentally incapacitated owner
-          has expired business licences
-          violates the provisions of the agency banking guidelines or the terms of the contract with the bank

Many Banks have started Agency Banking in Kenya and have trained the agents so as not to affect the service they offer to their customers.



[1] Section 4A of the Central Bank of Kenya Act
[2] No. 39 Of 2011
[3] Daily Nation, December 9th 2008. Michuki: probe Cash Transfer
[4] Remarks by Prof Njuguna Ndung’u , Governor Central bank of Kenya at the launch of the Draft Electronic Retail Transfers and Draft Electronic Money issuers Regulations
[5] Clause 5
[6] Clause 6
[7] Clause 7
[8] Clause 8
[9] Clause 9
[10] Clause 12
[11] Clause 9.9
[12] Why campaign to ride on M-Pesa success is Foolish, http://mobilemoneyafrica.com/p=3217
[13] Mas I and Morawczynski.  Designing Mobile Money Services Lessons from Mpesa. http://www.afminetwork.org
[14] Section 18 of the Unclaimed Financial Assets Bill, 2008