SAMPLE ORIGINATING SUMMONS

REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL SUIT NO. xxxxxxx OF 2005 (O.S)

IN THE MATTER OF THE LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT

AND

IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCELS REFERENCE NO. 196/XX

RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR………………………………….………….PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU………………………………….DEFENDANT

ORIGINATING SUMMONS

(Under Sections 17, 18, 37, and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22 of the Laws of Kenya and Order 36 Rule 3D of the Civil Procedure Rules)

LET UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU of Post Office Box xxxxxxx – 00502 Nairobi enter appearance within 15 days after service of this summons which is issued on the application of RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR who claims to have acquired Land Reference No. 196/XX hereinafter called the suit land for ORDERS THAT:

  1. The Applicant be declared to have become the legal owner entitled by adverse possession of over twelve (12) years since 1989 ALL THAT parcel of land comprised in Title Number LR No. 196/XX situated in Nairobi.
  2. The said Applicant be registered as the sole proprietor of the said parcel of land namely LR No. 196/XX in place of the above named Respondent in whose favour the land is currently registered.
  3. The last original indentures in respect of LR No. 196/XX which are with the Respondent be dispensed with.
  4. Costs of this application be provided for.

THIS SUMMONS is supported by the affidavit of RRRRRRRR and on other grounds to be adduced at the hearing hereof.

This summons was taken out by M/s Sheilla Sheikh & Associates Advocates for the above named RRRRRRRRRRRRR.

Dated at Nairobi this                                    day of                               2005


xxxxxxxxxxxx  & Associates
Advocates for the Applicant


Drawn & Filed By
xxxxxxxxxxx & Associates
Advocates
xxxxxxx Plaza, 3rd Floor, Rm 303
Westlands
P.O. Box 4XX23 – 00100
Nairobi.

To Be Served Upon
UUUUUUUUUUUUU
Catmose Farm
Uppingham
Oakham
Rutland LE156JD
U.K                                         (Service through applicant’s Advocates Office)



(If the Respondent does not enter an appearance within the time above mentioned such order may be made and proceedings taken as the court may think just and expedient.)





REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL SUIT NO. xxxxxxx OF 2005 (O.S)

IN THE MATTER OF THE LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT

AND

IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCELS REFERENCE NO. 196/XX

RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR………………………………….………….PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU………………………………….DEFENDANT


SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT
I, RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, of P.O. Box xxxxxxxx-00502, Nairobi, residing on Farm lane, off Dagoretti road, Karen, within the Republic of Kenya do hereby make oath and state as follows:
1.      THAT I am the plaintiff herein with the knowledge of the facts in issue hence I am competent to swear this affidavit.
2.      THAT I have been living on land parcel known as LR No. 196/XX Farm lane, off Dagoreti Road Karen, Nairobi with my wife and children since August 1989.
3.      THAT The Defendant is the registered proprietor of the suit land.  I attach hereto and mark AR – 1 a true certified copy of the title deed to the suit land.
4.      THAT I learnt of the existence of the said land in 1989 through one Simonson who was the Defendant’s next door neighbour.
5.      THAT Mr. Simonson informed me, which information I verily believed to be true that the Defendant had vacated the suit land sometime in 1970’s and left Kenya with his wife to settle in the United Kingdom of Britain as he and his wife both held British Nationalities.
6.      THAT initially I intended to enter upon the suit premises as a tenant and therefore, Mr. Simonson referred me to one D. Vincent who was an estate agent.  I paid Mr. Vincent Kshs. 6,000, being a finder’s fee and when I sought to know about the rent, Mr. Vincent informed me that all issues related to rent would be sorted out later.  He further reiterated that he had no instructions from the Defendant regarding the issues of rent, but the Defendant would liaise directly with me on the matter.  I then moved into the suit premises and, I sought to hear from the Defendant regarding the tenancy if at all he was interested but he informed me that he would prefer to sort out the issue when he and his family came back from England.
7.      THAT I moved onto the premises in or around August 1989.  The house was in complete dilapidated state.  The grounds were also in an unkempt state and the boundary fences were being encroached upon by the neighbouring slum dwellers.
8.      THAT as soon as I moved onto the premises I started repairing the house to bring it to a habitable standard.  I carried out extensive repairs using my own money in order to make the house habitable.  In addition I spent a lot of money to build and maintain a fence around the boundary so as secure the premises and enjoy the use of land to the exclusion of all other neighbours.
9.      THAT in the interim, although the Defendant was aware that I was living on the premises he made no efforts to demand rent or appoint an agent or a lawyer to collect rents or make any payments.  As a consequence, no Lease Agreement, rent agreement or any form of agreement or contract was ever drawn, executed or entered into.
10.  THAT the Defendant treated the whole matter in a very casual and indifferent manner almost to a point that one would be forced to conclude that he was not at all interested in the land.  This attitude was further reinforced by the fact that the Defendant, never made out a rent demand note, a rent invoice or bill, asking for any form of rent.
11.  THAT although I wrote to the Defendant, having obtained his address from D. Vincent enquiring on the issue of the rental the Defendant very casually informed me that he would sort the rents once he came to Kenya.
12.  THAT to the best of my knowledge, neither the Defendant nor his wife have ever come back to Kenya since they left to settle and make their future in Britain.
13.  THAT in the interim I paid up all the utility bills inclusive of water, electricity, telephone and land rates, I annex and make the same as AR-2
14.  THAT in addition to paying all the utility bills I have continuously maintained the dwelling house, the grounds, the boundary fence and all other facilities on the premises to a reasonable habitable standard all at my own cost.
15.  THAT for almost a 10-12 year period I never heard from the Defendant, and I positively believed that he had died as he is fairly old.  It was not until last year in 2004, when the Defendant wrote to me informing me that one David Harber who is and Estate Agent would be coming to the suit premises to value the property.
16.  THAT the said David Harber who was appointed by the Defendant came in or around April 2004, to carry out a valuation of the property.
17.  THAT being an Estate Agent David Harber has a vested interest in the property as he would make a substantial commission from selling it for the Defendant.
18.  THAT the main purpose of the valuation is to sell the property, yet I am advised by my advocate Shella Sheikh that I have acquired a right of adverse possession which right can be sought for at this Honourable Court.  Hence there is every likelihood that the suit property is in grave danger of being sold at the peril of my interest.
19.  THAT in addition I would like to further reiterate that my wife, Carolyn, moved into the suit premises in 1990 and we formalized our marriage in 19993.
20.  THAT we have since been blessed with three issues of our marriage, namely: Alex born in 1993, George born in 1995 and Katherine born in 2001.
21.  THAT consequently, my family and I have enjoyed uninterrupted continual possession of the said property since August 1989.
22.  THAT I have lived on the suit land without surreptitiousness, and with the knowledge of the Defendant without paying him rent, license fee or any other consideration and in a manner totally adverse to his interest on the suit property but he has never interfered with my occupation of the suit land.
23.  THAT I have to date been settling and paying all Land Rates and utility Bills as they have fallen due form time to time since 1989 to date.  So far, the amount of land rates I have paid in respect of the land parcel amounts to Kshs. 459,475.30.  I have made these payments in spite of the bills being addressed tot eh registered owner of the land parcel who is the Defendant herein.  I attach hereto and mark AR – 3 being true copies of the receipts in respect of the land rates paid.
24.  THAT  I pray tot eh Honourable Court to declare me the legal owner entitled by adverse possession of over twelve (12) years since 1989.
25.  THAT I have invested colossal sums of money in making substantive improvements to the existing dwelling house on the property and marinated it to a habitable standard continuously over since 1989. In addition I have kept the grounds in excellent condition and maintained a boundary fence around the property at al times since 1989.
26.  THAT I am advised by Ms Shella Sheikh, which advice I verily believe to be rue that I have a right of ownership by adverse possession in respect of the suit land which right accrued to me by virtue of my uninterrupted, continual, exclusive possession of the suit property for more than twelve years from 1989.
27.  THAT what I deponed to herein is true to the best of my knowledge, and save where the sources and basis thereof have been disclosed, information and belief.

Sworn at Nairobi by the said             }
RRRRRRRRRRR                              }  ………………………………….
This           day of                2005        }     Deponent
                                                            }
                                                            }
Before Me                                           }
                                                            }
                                                            }
Commissioner for Oaths                    }

Drawn & Filed By
xxxxxxxxx & Associates
Advocates
xxxxxxxx Plaza, 3rd Floor, Rm 303
West Lands
P.O. Box 4XX23 -00100

Nairobi

1 comment: