Question 1
“Now equity
is no part of the law, but a moral virtue, which qualifies, moderates,
and reforms the rigour, hardness and edge of the law, and is an
universal truth; it does also assist the law where it is defective and
weak in the constitution (which is the life of the law) and defends the
law from crafty evasions, delusions, and new subtleties, invested and
contrived to evade and delude the common law, whereby such as have
undoubted right are made remediless; and this is the office of equity,
to support and protect the common law from shifts and crafty
contrivances against the justice of the law. Equity therefore does not
destroy the law, nor create it, but assist it.”Per Lord Cowper, in Lord
Dudley v Lady Dudley (1705) Prec Ch 241, 244
With the above quote in mind, discuss the nature of equity. (20 marks)
Write notes about the following two equitable remedies:
Interlocutory Injunctions (10 marks)
Question 2
Mali,
a testator, disposed his residuary estate in percentages and gave 2% to
Audi NGO. Mali further provided that, should the gift on any share
fail, his trustees should hold ‘my residuary estate’ upon trust for his
grandchildren, Arthur and Morgana absolutely. The gift to Audi NGO
failed as the NGO had been wound up. It was argued that the residuary
estate passed to Arthur and Morgana. Arthur and Morgana wanted the words
‘such share of ‘inserted before ‘my residuary estate’.
Explore whether the testamentary document can be changed to reflect the wishes of the testator, in the circumstances.
Question 3
Kelly,
an 18 year old girl had formed a relationship with Khamasi, a 28 year
old man. After sometime the friendship broke down, Kelly decided that
she would have no more to do with Khamasi. Khamasi found it impossible
to accept Kelly’s decision. Khamasi has since been threatening Kelly on
several occasions. He has used threats and heaped abuses on Kelly. He
rings Kelly’s house incessantly, and threats to take legal action have
not put a stop to his behavior. Advise Kelly on the best remedy
available to her. (20 marks)
Question 4
An agreement was
entered between Funny and Fanusi that Funny would grant Fanusi a lease
of a house and Funny would be employed in the house throughout the
tenancy at a salary of Kshs 6000 per month, plus a commission on any
rents received in case Fanusi subleased the house. Fanusi so far has
agreed to the terms and has been paying Funny for his services at the
house but Fanusi has failed to share the commission he has been
receiving from subletting the premises.
Funny wants to bring action against Fanusi. Advice Funny on the equitable remedy available.
(20 marks)
No comments:
Post a Comment