RESERVATIONS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW



RESERVATIONS
A reservation as it is defined under Article 2(1) of Vienna Convention is a unilateral statement made by State when signing, ratifying, accepting approving or acceding to a treaty where the state purports to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the of the treaty in their application to that state. Effect of a reservation depends upon whether it is accepted or rejected by the states concerned. Traditionally, for reservations to be valid the treaty concerned had to permit them and the state parties had accepted them. Article 19 of Vienna Convention, a State may when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, formulate a reservation unless the treaty prohibits.
Kenya  signed  the Rome Statute, the founding the International Criminal Court(ICC),on on 11 August 1999 and ratified it on 15th  March 2005,allowing the  court jurisdiction over war crimes against and genocide committed by Kenyan nationals or on Kenyan territory after July 1 2002 when the statute entered into force. However in such a situation when Kenya is dissatisfied with implementation of the Statute, it cannot rely on reservations as an avenue to rectify the situation since under Article 120 of the statute, no reservations are permitted to be made to it .the fact that during its ratifying the statute, Kenya did not formulate any declaration to the effect. Declarations are usually deposited at the time of signature or at the time of deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. Optional and mandatory declarations impose legal obligations on the declarant .Must be signed by the Head of State, Head of Government or Minister for Foreign Affairs .Kenya failed to observe this in the appropriate time. Despite Rome Statute creating no room for reservations it’s silent on declarations. Australia which is a party to the statute after ratifying it on 2002, made a declaration to the effect that “The Government of Australia after considering the Statute ratified it with the following declaration the terms of which have full effect in Australian law, and which is not a reservation: Australia notes that a case will be inadmissible before the International Criminal Court where it is being investigated or prosecuted by a State. Australia reaffirms the primacy of its criminal jurisdiction in relation to crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. To enable Australia to exercise its jurisdiction effectively, and fully adhering to its obligations under the Statute of the Court, no person will be surrendered to the Court by Australia until it has had the full opportunity to investigate or prosecute any alleged crimes. For this purpose, the procedure under Australian law implementing the Statute of the Court provides that no person can be surrendered to the Court unless the Australian Attorney-General issues a certificate allowing surrender. Australian law also provides that no person can be arrested pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the Court without a certificate from the Attorney-General. Australia further declares its understanding that the offences in Article 6, 7 and 8 will be interpreted and applied in a way that accords with the way they are implemented in Australian domestic law."
This position leaves Kenya having no possibilities of depending on neither reservations nor declarations to try settling the mayhem in Kenya.
TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
Article 124 of the Rome Statute provides that after a State becomes a party it may declare that, for a period of seven years after entry into force of this Statute, State does not accept the jurisdiction of the court with respect to the categories of the rimes referred to in Article 8(Willful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, willfully causing great suffering) when the crime is alleged to have been committed by its nationals or on its territory. Its long past seven years after the Rome Statute came into force in Kenya thus can use this provision to rectify its dissatisfaction on the statute.


Participant Signature Ra



No comments:

Post a Comment